Qualcomm Didn't Have The Sufficient Power To Hurt Competition, An Expert Testified
Dhir Acharya - Jan 23, 2019
On Tuesday, a Qualcomm expert took her turn to testify the case, defending Qualcomm.
- Apple To Pay $6 Billion To Resolve the Dispute With QualComm
- Apple Resumes iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 Sale In Germany After Ban
- Qualcomm Wrapped Up Its Defense Against FTC's Accusations
Qualcomm didn’t have the power to impact competition in the mobile chip market, according to the testimony from Qualcomm expert Tasneem Chipty. At the company, Chipty specializes in competition policy and antitrust economics, she also runs her own consulting firm, Matrix Economics based in Boston.
On Tuesday, Chipty testified to the US Justice Department, saying when strong MediaTek chips hit the market or Intel won business with Apple, the company did a few things like cutting down on chip prices to win business. But that doesn’t mean it was anticompetitive. She claimed that the chip maker is not powerful enough to force phone makers into a situation where it would take billions of dollars from them.

According to Chipty, in fact, between 2014 and 2017, Qualcomm lost 50 points of market share while other competitors like Samsung, Huawei, Intel, and MediaTek have been getting points. Chipty added that in 2018, flagships of Apple and Huawei chose other companies’ processors instead of Qualcomm and Samsung bought its modems for only 35 percent of its handsets.
Regarding Apple, Chipty said there was competitive pressure from Intel, so the company had to innovate and cut down its prices.
Last week, Apple executive Matthias Sauer testified that in 2014, though Intel couldn’t meet Apple’s technology standards, it chose to use Intel’s modems and chips because Qualcomm would not give incentives for Apple to stay.

Apple said it had to go with Intel because Qualcomm didn't offer incentives
In her conclusion, Chipty stated that an FTC expert didn’t incorporate the term “competition” into his definition of market power appropriately, that he exaggerated the market power of the company, and the agreements between Apple and Qualcomm were based on legitimate business reasons without negative impact on competition.
The battle between Qualcomm and the Federal Trade Commission has been going on in the courtroom, San Jose, California, since January 4. Last week, the Commission completed its case against the chipmaker, and since then the chip maker has been defending against FTC’s accusations.
Featured Stories
ICT News - Apr 13, 2026
DDR4 RAM Prices Finally Fall After Soaring More Than 2,200 Percent
ICT News - Apr 06, 2026
Artemis II Crew Enters Moon's Gravitational Sphere on Historic Day 5
ICT News - Mar 31, 2026
DDR5 RAM Prices Finally Easing: Relief for PC Builders in 2026
ICT News - Mar 29, 2026
FTC Takes Action Against Debanking Practices by Major Financial Firms
ICT News - Mar 27, 2026
Palantir CTO Identifies Iran Conflict as First Large-Scale AI-Driven War
ICT News - Mar 24, 2026
OpenAI on the Brink: Major Setbacks Signal the Bursting of the AI Bubble
ICT News - Mar 20, 2026
Top 10 Most Popular Social Media Sites Based on User Count in 2026
ICT News - Mar 19, 2026
Billion Dollar Blunder: Meta Shuts Down Metaverse After Wasting $80,000,000,000.00
ICT News - Mar 18, 2026
X to Introduce Regional Controls for Posts and Replies
ICT News - Mar 17, 2026
Is DLSS 5 Helping Games or Hurting Developers' Creative Style?
Read more
Mobile- Apr 14, 2026
Samsung Ocean Mode: Does It Make Your Galaxy Phone Waterproof?
Always use proper protective housing when taking your phone underwater and follow Samsung’s guidelines to keep your device safe.
Comments
Sort by Newest | Popular