Facebook Refuses To Pay UK Fine In Cambridge Analytica Scandal
Parvati Misra
Despite the small amount, Facebook appeals to pay the fine following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
- Instagram Launches A Lite Version For Users In Rural And Remote Areas
- Australia Passed New Law That Requires Facebook And Google To Pay For News Content
- Facebook Stops Showing Australian Content, Even From Government Sites
Facebook does not agree to pay the fine of GBP 500,000 (approximately $644,000) for failing its job to ensure the privacy of the users in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The social network argued that regulators in the UK could not find any evidence that Britain users’ data were directly accessed.
The ICO (Information Commissioner Office) in Britain ruled the fine after confirming that Facebook did not treat its users’ data with care by giving third party’s app developers access to their data without any permission.
According to the ICO, after revealed to third-party developers, an amount of data was passed on to other entities including the SCL Group, Cambridge Analytica's parent company. For the record, the SCL Group counted the election campaign for President Donald Trump in 2016, besides other clients.
The ICO did not insist that the data of UK users was used in the campaign, but the data could be under other types of misuse.
Although the fine is tiny compared to Facebook’s enormous profit, Facebook appealed due to its reasoning of an undesirable idea to its users by the decision.
Anna Benckert – Facebook’s lawyer – stated that the ICO’s ruling on the fine is beyond the events of Cambridge Analytica because it relates to the basic regulations of how users should be permitted to share their information online.
Benckert took an example in users' daily activities. She said that based on ICO's theory, users should not have permission to forward messages or email addresses to third parties without the approval from the owners. But in fact, this kind of data sharing happens every day across millions of users.
Facebook has admitted that it made mistakes that resulted in Cambridge Analytica’s data misuse, as a consequence, it had stated that the loopholes had been closed in its platforms in order to prevent such incident from happening again.
The ICO did not immediately respond about the appeal.
Featured Stories
ICT News - Feb 19, 2026
Escalating Costs for NVIDIA RTX 50 Series GPUs: RTX 5090 Tops $5,000, RTX 5060 Ti...
ICT News - Feb 18, 2026
Google's Project Toscana: Elevating Pixel Face Unlock to Rival Apple's Face ID
Mobile - Feb 16, 2026
Xiaomi Launches Affordable Tracker to Compete with Apple's AirTag
ICT News - Feb 15, 2026
X Platform Poised to Introduce In-App Crypto and Stock Trading Soon
ICT News - Feb 13, 2026
Elon Musk Pivots: SpaceX Prioritizes Lunar Metropolis Over Martian Colony
ICT News - Feb 10, 2026
Discord's Teen Safety Sham: Why This Data Leak Magnet Isn't Worth Your Trust...
ICT News - Feb 09, 2026
PS6 Rumors: Game-Changing Specs Poised to Transform Console Play
ICT News - Feb 08, 2026
Is Elon Musk on the Path to Becoming the World's First Trillionaire?
ICT News - Feb 07, 2026
NVIDIA's Gaming GPU Drought: No New Releases in 2026 as AI Takes Priority
ICT News - Feb 06, 2026
Elon Musk Clarifies: No Starlink Phone in Development at SpaceX
Read More
Mobile- Feb 17, 2026
Anticipating the Samsung Galaxy S26 and S26+: Key Rumors and Specs
The Samsung Galaxy S26 series is on the horizon, sparking excitement among tech enthusiasts.
ICT News- Feb 19, 2026
Escalating Costs for NVIDIA RTX 50 Series GPUs: RTX 5090 Tops $5,000, RTX 5060 Ti Closes in on RTX 5070 Pricing
As the RTX 50 series continues to push boundaries in gaming and AI, these price trends raise questions about accessibility for average gamers.
ICT News- Feb 18, 2026
Google's Project Toscana: Elevating Pixel Face Unlock to Rival Apple's Face ID
As the smartphone landscape evolves, Google's push toward superior face unlock technology underscores its ambition to close the gap with Apple in user security and convenience.